Donnerstag, 6. März 2008

CL: Schalke04 geg. FC Porto

This Game was structural same as the Game, which I've written about Nuernberg vs. Benfica.
Of cause, this game was CL, so Speed and moving Off the ball is much more quickly and better.

Schalke has already won 1-0 1st leg. in Home town. They won'na keep 0-0 as long as possible til the end. Porto must go ahead to get a goal, but they have to keep having double point with AWAY-Goal rule in their head. They were in contradiction. Should they go, should they not?
Maurino has alreday pointed and suggested, the Rule it's self should be changed.

Manuell Neuer is great. He's saved the goal only one, covered diffence's holes of team.
I think' Germany doesn't has to worry about GK in 10 years.

Referee, that's problematic in Japan too, the Game was judged by a Refree form England.

He didn't see the Saving of Porto GK outside of P.A.
He didn't see Hand of DF of Schalke in P.A.

That's even at the End.
Yeah, he didn't judge but organised fifty fifty a game.

That's english enpirisism.
They don't have law by judgement but a band of gathered Exsamples.
They mean, " this Crime costs the panishment ". So, most important thing for them is, how even for two is the panishment at the End.

Keine Kommentare: